This has been the most challenging part of the Challenge for me so far. I have literally spent hours playing with Proquest, trying to understand it. I think the light bulb finally came on this evening.
Proquest is very "unencyclopedic." I just made up that word, for lack of a better term. In other words, it's very different from the previous sites I've used during this Challenge. And it's been a very long time since I have had to write a research paper.
First, I tried going in cold, and entering keywords. Didn't really understand the results I was getting. Seemed like the text articles I was finding were all book reviews. Began thinking "Why would I ever want to use this????" Today I talked to our Adult Services Librarian, Nita, and asked her that very question. Nita is very smart and very nice and VERY patient with me. She is also younger than I am, and I believe her brain to be much more nimble than mine.
Nita helped me see the value of Proquest as a research tool, and how it would be of value to someone doing research. It is a step up from the range of the World Book and SIRS sites. OK, that makes sense.
I did take time to read through the User Guide, which helped some. But mostly I sat down this afternoon and evening and played with the site. It took me a while, but I learned to find helpful information. I searched a bunch of different topics, in order to better understand the scope and limitations of a Proquest search.
My main observation: I think it would be difficult (or frustrating) for a patron to use Proquest for the first time without some guidance from someone who has previously worked with it.
I really enjoyed Filia's post on her blog. It's great to read about her enthusiasm for Proquest. I think she had a much better vision of its potential than I initially did.